Shelter Island Reporter

Among the benefits of smaller-town life is a concern for the Common Good. This benefit differs from sentiment or nostalgia. Human nature is, fundamentally, the same wherever and whenever; nonetheless, at one time, the purpose of the civics class in school was to imbue this sense of collective accountability through the presentation of the checks and balances, the ways and means of elected government and community living.


In this essay, we argue for a return to discussion and presentation of the Common Good. This plea is based on three observations of recent circumstances close to home: much good can be achieved in a short time when motivation is present; civil discussion is possible; and long-term thinking trumps short-term victories.


Here is a conclusion based on the first observation -- Motivation means much. Assemble a group that has decided on the importance of a topic or event and accomplishments abound in a short period of time. Delay deadens. The trick is to decide what is important, then to think, to plan and to act accordingly.


A second conclusion results from an appreciation of the effort made to present facts. Prior to opinions, facts rule. An agreed-upon fact may jump-start a seemingly deadlocked situation. Further, let the written text -- research, statute, guideline, ordinance -- serve as a basis for reasoned discourse prior to the intrusion of self-interest.


The third conclusion cherishes the conviction that those who disagree today need to continue to live in a harmonious community tomorrow.The urge to boast or to brood after a mere skirmish depletes the energy required to keep going, together.


This brief essay argues for the Common Good, which is a sure investment in the future. As my late father would say: “The good old days were not.” Motivation, civility and long-term thinking are worthy goals today. The Common Good need not be uncommon.